GaylidaysGLD INDEX

GLD COUNTRY SCORE

LOW
33/100
GLD Country Score
0100

Kazakhstan

The national picture for LGBTQ+ travel.

YOUR DESTINATION IN THE INDEX

Countries & territories worldwide#96 of 102
Countries & territories · Asia#19 of 21

Among destinations covered by this index with current publishable scores. Based on unrounded scores; equal values share a rank. As of 2026-09-27. How rankings work →

YOUR DESTINATION, IN CONTEXT

Kazakhstan LGBTQ+ Travel Guide & GLD Country Score

Kazakhstan has a published GLD Country Score of 33/100, in the Low range.

Kazakhstan does not criminalise consensual same-sex relations, but legal recognition, public organising and social acceptance remain limited. Almaty has the most identifiable networks, while the country’s vast geography amplifies regional differences.

DestinationCountry
GLD levelLow
City guides12
Understand the methodology

PLACES TO STAY

Selected hotels in Kazakhstan

Independent selections with sourced hotel information and LGBTQ+ travel context.

Loading the hotel selection…

BEYOND THE NATIONAL SCORE

LGBTQ+ travel in Kazakhstan: national context and local differences

Source-based overview · external sources consulted 2026-09-29. GLD score dates are shown separately.

Scale makes flights part of normal travel

Almaty, Astana, steppe and mountain regions are separated by large distances. Temperature extremes and border requirements shape itineraries.

Sources: Kazakhstan Travel — official tourism portal

What the city data adds

Gaylidays currently connects 12 scored cities to the national picture. Almaty, Astana, Charyn Canyon / Kolsai Lakes are the three highest-scoring cities currently covered. Recorded city scores range from 30/100 in Baikonur to 32/100 in Almaty, a 2-point spread that shows why local context still matters.

Source: GLD country and city scoring records. Interpretation of the recorded assessment, not a new score calculation.

Decriminalisation does not imply public freedom

Community networks operate discreetly amid limited protection and political pressure. International hotels should not be treated as evidence of broader acceptance.

Sources: Kazakhstan Travel — official tourism portal

Questions about LGBTQ+ travel in Kazakhstan

Are consensual same-sex relations criminalised?

No, but equal recognition and comprehensive protection are absent.

Sources: Kazakhstan Travel — official tourism portal
Why are domestic flights common?

Major cities and landscapes are separated by very large distances.

Sources: Kazakhstan Travel — official tourism portal

HOW TO READ THIS SCORE

Start with the national picture

The country score combines legal rights, social acceptance, rule of law and travel comfort. City guides add the local perspective to this national foundation.

Very Low 0–29Low 30–49Medium 50–69High 70–100

BEHIND THIS SCORE

What shapes the national picture?

The source-based overview above adds national and city-level context. These are the recorded score components; the editorial research has not recalculated them.

Legal rights40/10040/100
Social acceptance11/10011/100
Rule of law37/10037/100
Travel comfort29.5/10029.5/100

Components have different weights and may be subject to methodology caps; this is not a simple average.

Source context

Legal status from ILGA/Equaldex and 2025/2026 anti-LGBT propaganda law evidence; social score from Equaldex Public Opinion; rule of law from World Bank WGI; travel comfort from GLD editorial review using Eurasianet, Anadolu, ILGA-Europe and HRW evidence.

Synced from GLD Index on 27 Sept 2026. The sync date is not an evidence verification date.

Before you go.

Does this score guarantee safety?

No. Use the GLD Index alongside current official travel advice and local information. Conditions and personal experiences vary.

Where does this score come from?

This score is read from GLD Index’s data portal, using only current published or partner-ready records. Score last updated: 20 May 2026. Public display levels use the existing four-band scale; the underlying methodology category is tracked separately.